Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 SW3D 679 - Pyle v. Layton

Pyle v. Layton’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Friederich v. Chamberlain · Birdsong v. Christians · Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Thornton · Reese v. Ryan's Family Steakhouses, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) facts that negate any one of the claimant’s elements facts, (2) that the non-movant, after an adequate period of discovery, has not been able to produce, and will not be able to produce, evidence sufficient to allow the trier of fact to find the existence of any one of the claimant’s elements, or (3) that there is no genuine dispute as to the existence of each of the facts necessary to support the movant’s properly-pleaded affirmative defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) facts that negate any element of the plaintiffs cause of action, (2) the plaintiff, after adequate discovery, has not produced and will not be able to produce sufficient evidence on. each element of his claim, or (3) no genuine dispute as to the existence of each of the facts necessary to support the defending party’s properly-pleaded affirmative defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “‘(1) the existence of a duty to conform to a certain standard of conduct to protect others against unreasonable risks, (2) breach of the duty, (3) proximate cause, and (4) actual damages.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.