Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 TENN 281 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 1979
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1979

2 district · 8 state decisions

401949195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. State · Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Pryor · Wrather v. State · People v. Clapp · People v. Seaman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a felonious intent is an essential element of the crime, as it is in an attempt to procure an abortion, and the accused claims that his acts were lawful and innocent, it is competent for the prosecution to rebut the testimony of the accused by evidence of other criminal acts of his where he used the same or similar means to bring about the same result.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.