In re Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. . Alfani · 7 Ind. App. 529 - Eley v. Miller · In Re Duncan · Hanson v. Grattan · State v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Bona fide residence in the state is an essential condition for original admission to the bar, with actual domicile and an established place of business, so that there may be no insuperable obstacle placed in the way of service of process and papers and such attorney be subject to the orders of the courts of his state. In re Mosness, 39 Wis. 509 . Yet once admitted the right continues, and is for life unless revoked. Hanson v. Grattan, 84 Kan. 843 , 115 Pac. 646 , 34 L. R. A. n. s. 240; 6 Corp. Jur. 580. Mere absence from the state does not of itself necessarily forfeit or abandon the right to practice originally granted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.