Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Wis. 2d 105 - State v. Richter

189 Wis. 2d 105 - State v. Richter’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2017

18 state decisions

100199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 96 Wis. 2d 48 - State v. Rabe · 168 Wis. 2d 486 - State v. Sauceda · 80 Wis. 2d 402 - State v. Engler · 123 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Stevens · 140 Wis. 2d 468 - State v. Hirsch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We consider the applicable statutory section in analyzing these conflicting claims. Section 946.49(1), Stats., provides in relevant part: Bail jumping. (1) Whoever, having been released from custody under ch. 969, intentionally fails to comply with the terms of his or her bond .... The statute defines two elements for the crime of bail jumping. A defendant must be (1) released from custody on bail, and (2) intentionally fail to comply with the terms of the bail bond. Anderson submits that the use of the plural”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to determine whether the three counts of bail jumping were multiplicitous, we must apply a two- pronged test to the facts of this case . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In Richter , a defendant who was under three separate bonds argued that he could only be charged with one offense because the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.