Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Wis. 2d 31 - Skrupky v. Elbert

189 Wis. 2d 31 - Skrupky v. Elbert’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 113 Wis. 2d 61 - Sweet v. Berge · 113 Wis. 2d 550 - Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc. · 94 Wis. 2d 17 - Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc. · 102 Wis. 2d 305 - Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc. · 87 Wis. 2d 243 - Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actual authority is express when found within the explicit agency agreement itself, that is, the communication or contract between the principal and the agent. Actual authority is implied when the agent, not the third party, reasonably believes he or she has authority as a result of the action of the principal. An agent has the implied authority to do such acts as are usual, appropriate, necessary or proper to accomplish the purpose and objects of the agency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is possible for a principal to specify minutely what the agent is to do. To the extent that he does this, the agent may be said to have express authority. But most authority is created by implication.... These powers are all implied or inferred from the words used, from customs and from the relations of the parties. They are described as "implied authority."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[b]ecause Esser considered and interpreted virtually identical statutory language to that found here, the holding that Hansen does not apply is binding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.