Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Wis. 2d 505 - State v. Gerard

189 Wis. 2d 505 - State v. Gerard’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably State v. Derango (2000), 206 Wis. 2d 91 - State v. Wideman (1996)

28 state decisions

160199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 162 Wis. 2d 883 - State v. Martin · 118 Wis. 2d 339 - State v. Wickstrom · 83 Wis. 2d 368 - Whitaker v. State · 167 Wis. 2d 536 - City of Muskego v. Godec · 141 Wis. 2d 74 - State v. Trammel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever a person charged with a crime will be a repeater ... under s. 939.62 if convicted, any applicable prior convictions may be alleged in the complaint, indictment or information or amendments so alleging at any time before or at arraignment, and before acceptance of any plea. The court may, upon motion of the district attorney, grant a reasonable time to investigate possible prior convictions before accepting a plea. If the prior convictions are admitted by the defendant or proved by the state, he or she shall be subject to sentence under s. 939.62.. . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Long · 195 Wis. 2d 117 - State v. Koeppen
  2. “[d]ue process requires the defendant to be informed of his or her repeater status before pleading to the charges.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Stynes · State v. Bonds
  3. “Prejudice has always been a consideration with regard to amending a charging document.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Conger · 201 Wis. 2d 783 - State v. Campbell

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.