Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Wis. 2d 80 - State v. Mainiero

189 Wis. 2d 80 - State v. Mainiero’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 203 Wis. 2d 43 - State v. Behnke (1996), 223 Wis. 2d 777 - State v. Richard A. P. (1998)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

200199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bagley · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · 102 Wis. 2d 305 - Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]vidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A 'reasonable probability' is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 214 Wis. 2d 328 - State v. O'BRIEN · 191 Wis. 2d 205 - State v. Speese
  2. “If a matter is significant enough to invite appellate review, it is too important to subject to a remote summation procedure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 200 Wis. 2d 391 - State v. Munoz · 2003 WI App 168 - State v. McDowell
  3. “whether the psychiatric records contain[ed] information material to [Mainiero] that 'probably would have changed the outcome of [his] trial.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Mainiero v. Jordan

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.