Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 W. Va. 778 - State v. Nelson

189 W. Va. 778 - State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · O'CONNOR v. Ortega · United States v. Masters · 183 W. Va. 641 - State v. Edward Charles L. · United States v. Blok

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident. W.Va.R.Evid. 404(b).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[O)ne of the accepted bases for the admissibility of evidence of other crimes arises when such evidence, “furnishes part of the context of the crime” or is necessary to a “full presentation” of the case, or is so intimately connected with and explanatory of the crime charged against the defendant and is so much a part of the setting of the case and its “environment” that its proof is appropriate in order “to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.