Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 AD2D 464 - Faulk v. Aware, Inc.

Faulk v. Aware, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Green v. Wolf Corp. (1968), Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc. (1967)

15 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

150196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crane v. New York World Telegram Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'to keep a verdict for punitive damages within reasonable bounds considering the purpose to be achieved as well as the mala fides of the defendant in the particular case.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The plaintiff's prior earnings are an important factor in assessing the damage suffered when his earnings are cut off. His damage need not be limited to the level of his actual earnings at the time of the libel. His potential earnings may be taken into consideration when there is evidence to enable a jury to assess those potentialities. [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.