¶1Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County rendered upon a verdict convicting him of the first and second counts of a fouiveount indictment charging the crimes of criminally receiving stolen property -and criminally concealing and withholding stolen property. (Penal Law, § 1308.) The evidence clearly established the guilt of defendant and the proof abundantly sustains the convictions. We find no merit in the assignments of error in respect to the admission of evidence offered by the People. Nor can we say that the sentence imposed by the trial court was excessive. There is no showing tho-t any juror participating in the trial had read the newspaper account the publication of which is claimed to have interfered with defendant’s right to -a fair trial. Upon this record the trial court *675did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. - (People v. Lubin, 190 App. Div. 339, affd. 229 N. Y. 601; People v. Genovese, 10 N Y 2d 478.) Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
19 A.D.2d 674
People v. Austin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 27, 1963
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1963-06-27
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1965
1 state decisions
Relies on People v. . Lubin
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1963-06-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →