Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Ala. 104

Amason v. Nash

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1851

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1851-01-15

1. The judgment was rendered by default, before a declaration was filed, as appears by the certificate of the clerk, which states that the declaration was filed after the adjournment of the court which rendered the judgment. This certificate is part of the record. — M'cElroy v. Dwight, 1 Stew. 149. 2.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1899

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1851-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DARGAN, C. J.

¶1The authorities cited on the brief of the plaintiff’s counsel conclusively show that a judgment by default without a declaration is erroneous. We have in our practice, it is true, greatly relaxed the stringent rules of the common law; but we never have sustained a judgment by default, when there was no declaration. The record before us shows that at the time the judgment was rendered, no declaration had been filed, nor was it filed until after the adjournment of the court. The rendition of judgment without a declaration was an error which the plaintiff could not cure by filing a declaration after the court adjourned. — See McElroy v. Dwight, 1 Stewart, 149; Rankin v. Crowill, Minor’s R. 125.

¶2Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

/19/ala/104 · .json · Public domain