Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Ala. 239

Enis v. Ross

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1851

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1851-01-15

<p>EeRob. to the Circuit Court of Fayette.</p>

Relies on Mason v. Moore

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1851-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1962

5 state decisions

30185118601870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DARGAN, C. J.

¶1On the 31st of August, 1844, a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant, by a justice of the peace. In 1848, a certiorari was applied for and obtained by the defendant, returnable to the County Court, and by agreement between the parties, the cause was transferred from the County to the Circuit Court. The plaintiff moved the Circuit Court to dismiss the certiorari and the supersedeas that had been issued thereon, but his motion was overruled, and the plaintiff declining to proceed further in the trial of the cause, judgment was rendered against him for costs. In the case of Mason & Chambers v. Moore & Tulane, 12 Ala. 578, this court held, that a certiorari to review a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace could not be regularly granted after three years from the time of the rendition of such judgment. With this decision we are entirely satisfied, and hold that the lapse of three years is a bar to a writ of certiorari, the object of which is to bring before an appellate tribunal the judgment of ajusticeof the peace.

¶2The Circuit Court therefore erred in refusing to dismiss the certiorari on the motion of the plaintiff, and the judgment is therefore reversed, and the writ here dismissed.

/19/ala/239 · .json · Public domain