Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Ala. App. 248

96 So 724

Kennedy v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1923

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1923-05-29

Relies on Powell v. Folmar · Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Justice · 16 Ala. App. 545 - Crawley v. State

Decided 1923-05-29

SAMFORD, J.

¶1 The record contains a motion for new trial, a judgment overruling the motion, in which judgment it is noted that defendant excepts to the action of the court in overruling the motion, but there is no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, incorporating the motion for new trial, the action of the court in overruling the motion and exception thereto, this court cannot consider the Question. Birmingham W. W. Co. v. Justice, 204 Ala. 547, 86 South. 389; Powell v. Folmar, 201 Ala. 271, 78 South. 47; Crawley v. State, 16 Ala. App. 545, 79 South. 804.

¶2 There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/19/alaapp/248 · .json · Public domain