Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Ala. App. 437 - Baker v. State

19 Ala. App. 437 - Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 1991 · most notably Mason v. State (1953), Bridges v. State (1969)

33 state decisions

11019231930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 17 Ala. App. 674 - Dennison v. State · Gassenheimer v. State · Smith v. State · Ingram v. State · Shelton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Testimony seeking to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense charged, by proof of circumstances tending to show a different offense of a similar nature at a subsequent time, for which he is not on trial, is not admissible in evidence when the state has introduced evidence showing the commission of the offense charged, and the defendant's guilty connection therewith by direct, positive testimony of a specific act, which in itself constitutes the crime charged and the defendant's commission thereof."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where in a criminal case it becomes necessary to show a particular intent in order to establish the offense charged, evidence of subsequent acts of the same kind, constituting distinct offenses, and occurring more than a week after the offense for which the accused is on trial, and having no connection therewith, is inadmissible.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.