¶1 Defendant was convicted on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and appeals.
¶2 The defendant has had a fair trial before a jury of his peers, who on their oaths say he is guilty. There was evidence from which an inference of guilt could be predicated. When this is the case, the appellate court is not justified in disturbing the verdict.
¶3 . There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
¶4 Affirmed.