Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Ala. App. 77 - Davidson v. State

19 Ala. App. 77 - Davidson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1982

17 state decisions

601923193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant was entitled to know the extent of the witness' interest in the prosecution, as evidenced by the amount of money he was willing to pay towards the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`Something which is offensive to chastity; that which is offensive to chastity and modesty'.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.