Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Ala. App. 83

95 So 210

Shaw v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1922

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1922-11-21

Groyson, Judge. Ed S'h-aw was convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and he appeals. The record shows a certified transcript of the proceedings had in the inferior criminal court of Mobile county; and also shows an appeal bond executed by defendant on appeal from the inferior court to the circuit court, not certified. There appears no complaint on brief statement made by the solicit- or after the cause reached the circuit court.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1930

4 state decisions

Relies on Ex parte Rodgers · 17 Ala. App. 3 - Home Supply Co. v. Almon · 17 Ala. App. 112 - Corkran v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1922-11-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 On Rehearing.

¶2 [1, 2] The provision of Code 1907, § 6730, does not apply to prohibition cases. Ray v. State, 17 Ala. App, 333, 84 South. 878; Corkran v. State, 17 Ala. App. 112, 82 South. 560; Walker v. State, 17 Ala. App. 3, 81 South. 179.

¶3 The appeal was taken and proceedings certified in accordance with section 6726, Code 1907, and they were sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction of the person. Ex parte Rodgers, 12 Ala. App. 218, 67 South. 710.

¶4 The application is overruled.

/19/alaapp/83 · .json · Public domain