Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 ARIZ 310 - Hunter v. Daze

Hunter v. Daze’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1931
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dodge v. McDonnell · Wartman v. Pecka · Ives v. Sanguinetti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our statute provides that the levy of the writ of attachment upon property creates a lien from the date of such levy, unless the writ should be quashed or otherwise vacated. ... We do not understand that the mere omission to foreclose an attachment lien, or the omission of an order of sale from the judgment at the time of its rendition, would quash or necessarily vacate the writ.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.