Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 ARIZ 361 - Duff v. State

Duff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1983
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1983

8 state decisions

4019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cluff v. State · State v. Peterson · 48 Tex. Crim. 617 - Childress v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ We are asked to scrutinize inconsistencies in the testimony that are inevitable in the record of every ease, to destroy the weight and credibility of the testimony on account of the interest and character of the prosecuting witness, and reconcile the conflicts and resolve all doubts in favor of the defendant. This is all matter for argument to a jury, and it was their exclusive province to determine it. They have determined it against the defendant upon substantial evidence, and there it must end. There is no law forbidding the employment of detectives to aid in the discovery and suppression of crime. Such a method is not inherently bad. Its credibility and weight is therefore for the consideration of the jury.” Duff v. State, 19 Ariz. 361 , 171 Pac. 133, 135 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Our duty is limited, then, to ascertaining if there be any substantial evidence in the record to support such a verdict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.