Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Ark. 476

State v. Mills

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1858

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1858-01-15

<p>The verdict of a jury, in a criminal prosecution, is of no validity until delivered by the jury, in court: and if the clerk receive the verdict, in the recess of the court, without the direction of court or consent of parties, and the jury disperse, a venire de novo should be awarded.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2012

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Chief Justice English

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶2Mills was indicted in the Van Burén Circuit Court for an assault and battery. He pleaded not guilty, and was put upon his trial. After the evidence was introduced, and the case submitted to the jury, the Court took a recess for dinner. Before the Court met again, the jury returned to the clerk a verdict of not guilty, which he received, and the jury were “ dismissed by the sheriff,” says the bill of exceptions, and permitted to disperse.

¶3After the Court met, the prosecuting attorney filed a motion to set aside the verdict, because it was delivered to the clerk in the recess of the Court, without the direction of the Court, or consent of parties: the Court overruled the motion, and rendered judgment upon the verdict, discharging the defendant. The prosecuting attorney excepted and appealed.

¶4The verdict was of no validity until delivered, by the jury, in Court. The clerk had no authority to receive it. 1 Bacon Abr., Title, Verdict, letter B; 3 Johnson Rep. 255; 1 Johns. Cases 308; 7 John. R. 32; 6 Ib. 68.

¶5The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to the Court to set aside the verdict, and award a venire de novo.

/19/ark/476 · .json · Public domain