Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 BTA 621 - Leininger v. Commissioner

Leininger v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1945
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Lucas v. Earl · Cohan v. Commissioner · Mitchel v. Commissioner · Shults Bread Co. v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if petitioner’s wife be considered as a subpartner or in partnership solely with her husband, the incidence of the taxing statute would not thereby be avoided, for the income earned on the one-half interest standing in the name of O. P. Leininger would first be income to him, taxable as such before its division with his wife. See Ormsby McKnight Mitchel, 1 B. T. A. 143; aff'd., 9 Fed. (2d) 414; 15 Fed. (2d) 287.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The principal question for determination in these cases is whether petitioner is liable for tax on all of the profits of a one-half interest in a partnership or whether, under the facts his wife may return for taxation one-half of such profits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a full equal partner with him in his interest in the partnership”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.