Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 BTA 982 - Haag v. Commissioner

Haag v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1989 · most notably Estate of Wood v. Commissioner (1989), Commissioner v. Owens (1935)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

130193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosenthal v. Walker · Lawrence v. Commissioner · Evans v. Commissioner · Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Frommhold · Kaufmann v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * The scheme of taxing income under the revenue acts does not contemplate that income of an estate be taxable both to the estate and to the beneficiary in the same year. Furthermore, we think that it was not intended to tax such income to the estate in one year and to the beneficiary in another. The Commissioner .has so interpreted the law in Regulations 65, article 344. We are therefore of the opinion that when income received by an estate is properly included in the gross income of the estate under the provisions of the Revenue Act and is not permitted to be deducted from the gross income of the estate and charged to the beneficiary for income-tax purposes under the provisions of the Revenue Act, such income may never be included in the gross income of the beneficiary.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.