Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 CAL2D 870 - Connell v. Bowes

Connell v. Bowes’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
3
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 10 Cal. 3d 665 - Raedeke v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Ass'n (1974), Ring v. Spina (1948)

2 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

21019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Angus v. Craven · Bettencourt v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it does not seem desirable to force a party to give up his right to a jury trial as an alternative to utilizing the advantages of modern code procedure designed to permit settlement of various issues in a single action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is now established in this state * * * that if a complaint states two complete rights of action, one legal and one equitable, a jury trial may be obtained upon the issues raised by the legal cause,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.