Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 Cal. 3d 970 - Bailey v. Superior Court

19 Cal. 3d 970 - Bailey v. Superior Court’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

267
cited by 267 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

260 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 267 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 37 Cal. 3d 873 - People v. Lance W. (1985), 43 Cal. 3d 1002 - People v. Woodhead (1987)

260 state decisions

122019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 56 Cal. 2d 355 - Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court · 14 Cal. 3d 831 - Estate of McDill · 43 Cal. 2d 651 - In Re Williamson · 71 Cal. 2d 276 - Burke v. Superior Court · 228 Cal. App. 2d 139 - Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 267 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Videotaping is not affirmatively authorized in this case and, as in Bailey , whether it should be `is a matter for the Legislature to determine.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the question presented is whether the use of videotape for the recording and reporting of deposition testimony has been authorized by the Legislature. " ( Id. ; italics in original.) We concluded that whether "other methods of recording and reporting depositions should now be authorized is a matter for the Legislature to determine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “leads ineluctably to one conclusion; that is, the Legislature intended that depositions be stenographically recorded and transcribed into a `writing' (as that term is defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 17) unless the parties agree otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.