Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Cal. App. 2d 589

Clay v. Clay

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1937

California Court of Appeal · decided 1937-03-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1974

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1937-03-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CRAIL, P. J.

¶1This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

¶2It is a sufficient compliance with the constitutional provision, which requires us to state the reasons for our decisions in writing, to say in this ease that the appellant and respondent have stipulated that the decision herein be rendered.

¶3The stipulation also provides that this court direct the trial court to enter judgment for the defendant. But this we refuse to do. This is a divorce case and the trial court may well exercise its authority in the premises after trial or after hearing on a motion.

¶4*590The judgment is reversed. Each party is to pay his or her own costs on appeal. Let remittitur issue forthwith.

¶5Wood, J., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

/19/calapp2d/589 · .json · Public domain