In Re McKelvey’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1951
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Radice v. People of New York · The People v. Monroe · Riley v. Forbes · 111 Cal. App. 731 - Niceley v. County of Madera · Matter of Application of Clary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All presumptions are in favor of the validity of acts passed by the legislature and the classifications made by the legislature will not be disturbed by the courts unless they are ‘actually and palpably unreasonable and arbitrary.’ (Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292 [ 44 S.Ct. 325 , 68 L.Ed. 690 ]; Rainey V. Michel, 6 Cal.2d 259 [ 57 P.2d 932 , 105 A.L.R 148].) ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.