Wright v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 114 · 21 U.S.C. § 134 · 28 U.S.C. § 1451
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Miller · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Julius Goldman's Egg City v. United States · Multistate Legal Studies, Inc. v. Ladd, Register of Copyrights
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“displayed independent understanding of the breeder industry and the condition of [Wright's] birds at the time of their destruction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the majority of expert witnesses at trial ... agreed that they expected transportation costs to be paid in these circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“because expert testimony at trial established lost profits as one of the elements necessary to a fair market valuation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.