Jones v. Perot’s Empirical Analysis
1893
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1914
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Haney v. People · Mattison v. Childs · Vance's Heirs v. Maroney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Judgment may be given for or against one or more of several plaintiffs, and for or against one or more of several defendants; and it may, when the justice of the case requires, it, determine the ultimate rights of the parties on each side as between themselves,””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reyer v. Blaisdell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.