Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 COLO 371 - Rittmaster v. Brisbane

Rittmaster v. Brisbane’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2009

1 district · 15 state decisions

40189419001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sieber v. Frink · Stock-Growers' Bank v. Newton · Jackson v. Allen · Miller v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deed purports to convey an estate in fee simple absolute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “purport to convey an estate in fee simple absolute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.