Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 CONNAPP 420 - Baldwin v. Baldwin

Baldwin v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2022

16 state decisions

9019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. · Lopinto v. Haines · Sturtevant v. Sturtevant · Marcus v. Marcus · Bolmer v. Kocet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]ntent . . . is to be ascertained by a fair and reasonable construction of the written words and . . . the language used must be accorded its common, natural, and ordinary meaning and usage where it can be sensibly applied to the subject matter of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.