¶1Opinion by
¶2It appeared from the testimony that the merchandise in question is of the same dutiable character as the umbrella cloth covered by Caesar & Co. v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 34, C. D. 278), id. v. id. (6 Cust. Ct. 455, C. D. 515), and Abstract 50363. The protests were therefore sustained as to either of the claims made, according to the dates of entry or withdrawal from warehouse, but overruled in all other respects.