Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 F.3d 12

Docket No. 93-6970.

Turner v. Smith

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994. Decided March 8, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-03-08

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2004 · most notably United States v. Little (2004), United States v. Haynes (1994)

34 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1994-03-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-93-1175-JFM).

¶1

Joseph Mario Turner, appellant pro se.

¶2

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Thomas Kevin Clancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

¶3

D.Md.

¶4

AFFIRMED.

¶5

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶6

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Smith, No. CA-93-1175-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 31, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/19/f3d/12 · .json · Public domain