Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 F.3d 1428

Docket Nos. 91-1597, 92-2363.

Carpenter v. Drechsler

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Patrick G. CARPENTERv.Shirley Lee DRECHSLER; Gerhard Drechsler; P.S. Brice, Defendants-Appellees, and Mary J. NORSEWORTHY, Defendant. Patrick G
  • CARPENTERv.Mary J. NORSEWORTHY, Defendant-Appellee, and Shirley Lee DRECHSLER; Gerhard Drechsler; P.S. Brice

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 29, 1993. Decided March 15, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-03-15

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1994

19 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr., District Judge; B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge (CA-89-66-H)

Patrick G. Carpenter, appellant pro se.

Mark Bowman Callahan, Lloyd Bradford Braford, Clark & Bradshaw, P.C., Harrisonbug, VA; Gregory Thomas St. Ours, Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver, Harrisonburg, VA; Ellen Lewis Bane, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Charlottesville, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In these consolidated case, Patrick G. Carpenter appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his action charging damage to his reputation and business (No. 91-1957) and the magistrate judge's order imposing sanctions against him (No. 92-2363). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carpenter v. Drechsler, No. CA-89-66-H (W.D. Va. May 7, 1991 & Sept. 22, 1992). We grant Carpenter and Norseworthy's motions to dismiss Norseworthy as a party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/19/f3d/1428 · .json · Public domain