Wells, Waters & Gases, Incorporated v. Air Products & Chemicals, Incorporated, Wells, Waters & Gases, Incorporated v. Air Products & Chemicals, Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
19 F.3d 157 · 1994
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2010
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Carnegie v. United States · Brame v. United States · Monetti Spa Usa v. Anchor Hocking Corporation · Farrow v. Cahill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the terms of the [ ] contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.