Crank v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
19 F.3d 172 · 1994
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Penry v. Lynaugh · Barefoot v. Estelle · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · Graham v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different manner]; or that questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hallmark v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.