Miller National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center’s Empirical Analysis
19 F.3d 449 · 1994
Citation profile
91 federal appellate · 35 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 210 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Dr Seuss Enterprises Lp v. Penguin Books Usa Inc (1997), Does 1 v. Chandler (1996)
91 federal appellate · 35 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Honig v. Doe · Weinstein v. Bradford · Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart · Hecht Co. v. Bowles · First National Bank of Boston v. X Bellotti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 210 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The moving party must show ‘either (1) a combination of probable success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable harm, or (2) the existence of serious questions going to the merits, the balance of hardships tipping sharply in its favor, and at least a fair chance of success on the merits.’”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Board shall have power, upon issuance of a complaint as provided in subsection (b) of this section charging that any person has engaged in or is engaging in an unfair labor practice, to petition any United States district court, within any district wherein the unfair labor practice in question is alleged to have occurred or wherein such person resides or transacts business, for appropriate temporary relief or restraining order. Upon the filing of any such petition the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon such person, and thereupon shall have jurisdiction to grant to the Board such temporary relief or restraining order as it deems just and proper.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.