Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 F.3d 482 - United States v. Forrester

United States v. Forrester’s Empirical Analysis

19 F.3d 482 · 1994

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
September 2004
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583

Relies on Stinson v. United States · Williams v. United States · United States v. Baclaan · United States v. Levi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Having [done so], the court was free to reject the suggested sentencing range of to months.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “revoke a sentence of probation and impose any other sentence that was available under subchapter A at the time of the initial sentencing.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not purport to interpret a guideline.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.