Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 F.3d 531 - Steele v. United States

Steele v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

19 F.3d 531 · 1994

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
February 2013
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2013

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

120199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 5 U.S.C. § 1214 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302

Relies on Bush v. Lucas · United States v. Fausto · Petrini v. Howard · Ayala v. Joy Manufacturing Co. · Berrios v. Department of the Army

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]ederal civil servants are now protected by an elaborate, comprehensive scheme that encompasses substantive provisions forbidding arbitrary action by supervisors and procedures--administrative and judicial--by which improper action may be redressed. They apply to a multitude of personnel decisions that are made daily by federal agencies.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Federal and state court actions 'complain[ing] of activities prohibited by the CSRA ... are preempted by the CSRA.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is defined under 5 U.S.C. 2302. Of this comprehensive CSRA claims procedure the Supreme Court said:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.