Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 F.3d 533 - Stephanie L. Stahl v. Sun Mi

Stephanie L. Stahl v. Sun Mi’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably United States v. Duncan (2001), Decker v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Colorado, Inc. (1997)

2 federal appellate · 22 district · 4 state decisions

220199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber Company · Belmont International, Inc. v. American International Shoe Co. · Nulf v. International Paper Co. · Boone · Krieger v. Gold Bond Building Products

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the nature of an employee's environment, however unpleasant, is not due to her gender, she has not been the victim of sex discrimination as a result of that environment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'All Personnel actions, including recruitment, selection, training, compensation, promotion, and recreation, shall be based upon individual ability, interests, and performance.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'We are clear about expectations and provide rewards and recognition on the basis of contributions. We treat people equitably and consistently.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.