United States v. Acanda’s Empirical Analysis
19 F.3d 616 · 1994
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Shaw v. Barr · Dock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Technologies · United States v. Skinner · United States v. Huppert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A higher base offense level is specified if the defendant is convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1)(A), (a)(2)(A), or (a)(3)(A) because those subsections apply to defendants who encouraged or facilitated the commission of further crimes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The base offense level from the guideline for the substantive offense, plus any adjustments from such guideline for any intended offense conduct that can be established with reasonable certainty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.