Silva v. Witschen’s Empirical Analysis
19 F.3d 725 · 1994
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 13 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Farmers Insurance Exchange v. RNK, Inc. (2011), Amlong & Amlong, P.A. v. Denny's, Inc. (2006)
15 federal appellate · 13 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2074 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Santoni v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all proceedings in civil cases thereafter commenced and, insofar as just and practicable, all proceedings in civil cases then pending.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the court may award to the party prevailing on the motion the reasonable expenses and attorney's fees incurred in presenting or opposing the motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re: Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation. Esso Standard Oil S.A. Ltd. Esso Virgin Islands, Inc. Esso Standard Oil Co. (Puerto Rico), in No. 96-7385, Goldman, Antonetti & Cordova Francis Torres, Esquire Jose Cepeda, Esquire, in No. 96-7386, Eugenio C. Romero, an Attorney at Law, in No. 96-7387, L'henri, Inc., in No. 96-7388, Rhoda Harthman Charlotte A. Labarre Albert E. Harthman Arthur E. Harthman Austin E. Harthman Edgar A. Harthman Sammy E. Harthman P.I.D., Inc. Tutu Services, Limited, in No. 96-7389, Ramsay Motors, Inc., in No. 96-7390, Texaco Inc. Texaco Caribbean, Inc. Vernon Morgan, in No. 96-7391, Four Winds Plaza Partnership, in No. 96-7392 · Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation Sa 96-7385 96-7386 96-7387 96-7388 Pid 96-7389 96-7390 96-7391 96-7392“(b) Representations to Court. By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,— (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause- unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law; (3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.