Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 F.3d 857 - Pemberthy v. Beyer

Pemberthy v. Beyer’s Empirical Analysis

19 F.3d 857 · 1994

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably City of Beaumont v. Bouillion (1995), United States v. Canoy (1994)

22 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

200199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Hernandez v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be 'presumed to be correct' unless [they are] not 'fairly supported by the record.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In sum, we hold that the Appellate Division made a factual determination that the prosecutor peremptorily challenged the prospective jurors in question because of their ability to speak Spanish, that this determination is fairly supported by the record, and that it was therefore binding on the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to strike . . . accountants in cases with accounting or tax issues”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.