Kellogg-Roe v. Gerry’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Faretta v. California · Jones v. Barnes · McCoy v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a federal court may issue the writ if the state court decision 'was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court - 6 - AEDPA further mandates that where a federal claim was "adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Watson v. Edmark“contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Watson v. Edmark“the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act ('AEDPA'), which governs petitions for writs of habeas corpus,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Watson v. Edmark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.