United States v. Robison’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 6928
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Bagley · Brady v. United States · United States v. Nordby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an unlawful discharge, emission, or release into the environment of a hazardous or toxic substance.” The initial wording of Application Note 19 (former Application Note 20) is verbatim the initial wording of Application Note 3 of § 2D1.12(b)(2). The Robison court concluded that nothing in the wording of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(5) or the application note suggests”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.