Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 FRD 201 - Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.

Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
September 2000
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2000

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

40195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 146

Relies on Waterman v. Mackenzie · Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. · Hill v. Wooster · Gandy v. Marble · Sanford v. Kepner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Joint owners of a patent are at the mercy of each other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.