19 F. Supp. 2d 543 - Glavin v. Clinton’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2019
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 13 U.S.C. § 141 · 13 U.S.C. § 195
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Baker v. Carr · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“allegations of decreased federal and state funding is fairly traceable to population counts reported in the decennial census”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'there is a direct correlation between decennial census population counts and federal and state funding allocations,' and that 'allegations of decreased federal and state funding [are] fairly traceable to population counts reported in the decennial census.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.