19 F. Supp. 2d 649 - Webb v. Banquer’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Ferguson v. National Broadcasting Co. · Phillips Oil Co. v. OKC Corp. · Union Planters National Leasing, Inc. v. Woods · Mas v. Perry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the name of the personal representative of the deceased person for the benefit of all persons entitled under the law to recover,” or by a statutory beneficiary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.