19 F. Supp. 2d 697 - Galindo v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2261 (§ 107 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Coleman v. Thompson · Johnson v. United States · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'a properly filed application' is one submitted according to the state's procedural requirements, such as the rules governing notice and the time and place of filing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“After all, Congress chose the phrase 'a properly filed application,' one into which we do not read any requirement that the application be non-frivolous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.