Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 19 ILL 376 - Newland v. Marsh

Newland v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

1857

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably 135 S. Ct. 1932 - Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif (2015), State v. Gerhardt (1896)

1 federal appellate · 49 state decisions — followed in 21 states

16018571860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harding v. Butts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““So will acts of the legislature having elements of limitation, and capable of being so applied and administered, although the words are broad enough to and do, literally read, strike at the right itself, be construed to limit and control the remedy; for as such they are valid, but as weapons destructive of vested, rights they are void, and such force only will be given the acts as the legislature could impart to them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It [the statute] does not commence running only from possession taken of the land, but from the time of the concurrence of the two things — the color of title and payment of taxes — and has performed its office, when the color of title and payment of taxes have gone together for the period of limitation; and it is the same to the party availing himself of the bar whether he is sued whilst in or out of possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.