Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 194

Brown v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided April 18, 1950

Court of Claims of Illinois · decided 1950-04-18

Decided 1950-04-18

SCHUMAN, C. J.

¶1Claimant, Rufus H. Brown, was employed in the Division of Highways of the State of Illinois as a highway section man’s helper.

¶2No jurisdictional questions are raised. Claimant’s', earnings for the year preceding his claim were $2,158.06.. He is married, but has no children under 16 years of age dependent upon him for support.

¶3On October 27, 1948, Mr. Brown was one of a group of men assigned to remove broken concrete and other debris from the shoulders of SBI 1, about 3% miles north of Norris City. At approximately 10:00 A.M., Mr. Brown started to pick up a piece of concrete. As he lifted, he felt a sharp pain in his right hip region. Although the pain persisted, Mr. Brown continued working. He consulted his family physician, Dr. J. Bryant, who on November 4, 1948, recommended an examination by a specialist in back injuries.

¶4The Division of Highways completed arrangements for an examination of Mr. Brown on November 8, 1948 at the office of Dr. J. Albert Key, professor of clinical orthopedic surgery, .Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Dr. Key has as associates, Dr. Fred Reynolds, instructor of clinical orthopedic surgery, Washington University, School of Medicine, and Dr. Lee T. Ford, a specialist in orthopedics.

¶5Doctors Reynolds and Ford submitted medical reports, which showed that claimant was operated on on December 7,1948; that an old rupture of the lumbo sacral disc on the right was found and removed, and at the ■space between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae on the right a completely ruptured disc was present, which was removed.

¶6The last medical report showed the following:

“Mr. Rufus Brown, who was operated upon on December 7, 1948 at Barnes Hospital, was seen on June 9, 1949. He had moderate limitation of back motions in all directions. The right ankle jerk is still absent, and the left is diminished. He complained of a little tenderness in the incisional scar in the lower back. Straight leg raising was limited on each side at 80°, but there was no pain. He was advised to attempt to do more work. He was dismissed from further care here, unless he should have further trouble.”

¶7The testimony of the claimant taken on November 29, 1949 shows that he has not been back to the doctors, since Jnne 9, 1949.

¶8From a review of the record it is shown that claimant was paid $538.19 for a period of 24 2/7 weeks through May 15, 1949. On June 9, 1949 the doctors dismissed him from further care and he was advised to do more work. Extending his compensation - payments through June 9, 1949, claimant would be entitled to 27 6/7 weeks- or a total of $543.20. He was paid $538.19, leaving a. balance of $5.01. This would fully compensate claimant for temporary total disability.

¶9There is no showing in the record of the nature and extent of a permanent partial disability. There is no showing of a difference in earning capacity, or proof of' what claimant is able to earn in some suitable employment. Any claim for permanent or permanent partial disability will have to be denied.

¶10An award is entered in favor of claimant for $5.01,. balance on total permanent, and is payable forthwith.

¶11The claim of Marie Springs for stenographic services "in the amount of $12.29 is found reasonable and an award in the amount of $12.29 is hereby allowed.

¶12This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”

/19/illctcl/194 · .json · Public domain